Dear People -Some of you are getting latehred up over nothing. The new video of the Kenyan BC is nothing in and of itself. It may or may not be real. Just like ANY other alleged official document (including the image on FTS), it must be handled and authenticated by document experts.It's main usefulness is to further illustrate the confustion that surrounds this whole issue. And the confustion will NOT go away until the real deal (whatever and wherever it is) is handled and authenticated by impartial document experts.The message is becoming louder and clearer this MUST be run to ground in short order.Finally gross critiques (i.e. overall confirmation) of the document are helpful. Detailed critiques are a waste of time! Do you have the document in your hands? Are you a document expert? For instance, the footprint: If it was irregular for footprints to appear at this time and place, then that is useful information. That the footprints are too dark is ridiculous. Do you think this is THE original BC with an actual inked footprint? Of course not, there is only one of those. At best this is a completely legal, duly certified, XEROX of the original. Give me a break.
by Pankaj 04:56:34 AM 2012.10.03 |