In fact We had a discussion about it, and I reaehpsrd it to be clear.. PLEASE put my question (if it wins) to the scientists, not the simplified, vague question you have produced.. -The political target for limiting temp rise is 2C given that the current rate of warming is substantially less than the rate of waming required to get to 2C by 2050 (or 2040?)when will the world start warming at the 0.3C (average) per decade to hit this figure?(ie emissions are projected to rise, but temps are not following)So at what point do the computer models, suggest that this high rate of warming commences (which is higher than that observed in the 80â?²s and 90â?²s..)

by Prakash 07:29:58 AM 2013.06.30

Many of the arguments agianst Global Warming are actually arguments agianst some of the proposed solutions to global warming problem Such as:1. The using many of our crops natural sugars to form ethanol that can power our cars.This disagreement comes from the fact that there are more efficient, more natural ways of obtaining ethanol than many of our crops, including corn. Mycellium is a better example, than them. Also, much of the deforestation, and loss of soil for farming, can be drastically reduced through the use of mycellium over corn or other crops in producing ethanol.2. Use of key protocols such as Kyoto to curb the emissions of the U.S. and other industrialized nations.The truth is, this agreement is SERIOUSLY in need of being updated, even if the agreement was fully complied with, the industrialized world would easily become dwarfed in the near future by nations that are never part of this, but are becoming more industrialized, and are rapidly growing in their emissions. This includes China, Brazil, Mexico, South Korea, Malaysia, India, and Indonesia, they will easily dwarf the U.S., Japan, and the European Union in the near future, and there is NO Policy targeting them, only the currently industrialized world.

by Vinit 11:13:04 AM 2013.06.30