this is my sincerest adcvie, i think some wont like the sound of it, but its a useful alternative perspective IF some find soI dont see much results from trying to set up this proposed AssociationSomeone can try moot this idea to the Public Offices, but then they also understand fully why they SHOULD NOT do soSimple reasons:1. The Association CANNOT refer to specific identities when making references, meaning they CANNOT differentiate or distinguish between any 2 or more entities, thats a very touchy legal minefield waiting to explode (or implode) at the first mistake, be it comparision, critisism, or even plain 'feedback'..further imagine a top mgmt or even a simple Consultant appointed who was a former Bank X Executive or Board of Director, but you couldnt just hired any man off the street isnt it??2. The Association CANNOT provide an educational course WITHOUT approval and registration of its parental supervising entity, BUT with those credentials who wants to oversee this ticking timebomb? MoF? EDB? MAS? Spring? MoE?3. Without any the above - a firm basis of establishment and the necessary social political backing, the Association risks running into poor financial standing pretty soon, either due to lack of consistent funding channels (and they cant collect rights or licensing, or co-branding from industry without backing), OR worst (and likely to avoid an early demise), it has to start to accepting possibly dubious, or at best questionable sponsorships from the very industrial players its supposingly to be 'educating the public' about.Imagine the Road from there hence even if it was to survive the first waves and storms of outcries after ANOTHER outbreak of such financial debacles as the ones faced right nowHas it been 'educating the wrong thing'? What is a 'wrong thing'? So can it help with compensation? Is it pressured to help'? Even then, does it have the 'right, competent, responsible, honest VOLUNTEERS' armed with the right legal resources?...Hmm

by Tassia 04:18:14 PM 2013.03.14